<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bilski Case:  Not With My Digital Economy, You Don&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larrydownes.com/the-bilski-case-not-with-my-digital-economy-you-dont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larrydownes.com/the-bilski-case-not-with-my-digital-economy-you-dont/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilski: Justice Stevens’ Last Tilt at the IP Windmills &#124; Larry Downes</title>
		<link>http://larrydownes.com/the-bilski-case-not-with-my-digital-economy-you-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-3726</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilski: Justice Stevens’ Last Tilt at the IP Windmills &#124; Larry Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrydownes.com/?p=935#comment-3726</guid>
		<description>[...] I dashed off a quick analysis of the Bilski decision for CNET yesterday (see “Supreme Court Hedges on Business Method Patents”), a follow-up to a piece I wrote for The Big Money when the case was argued last fall.  (See “Not with my Digital Economy, You Don’t.”) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I dashed off a quick analysis of the Bilski decision for CNET yesterday (see “Supreme Court Hedges on Business Method Patents”), a follow-up to a piece I wrote for The Big Money when the case was argued last fall.  (See “Not with my Digital Economy, You Don’t.”) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court Punts on Patent Case - Hit &#38; Run : Reason Magazine</title>
		<link>http://larrydownes.com/the-bilski-case-not-with-my-digital-economy-you-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-3724</link>
		<dc:creator>Court Punts on Patent Case - Hit &#38; Run : Reason Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrydownes.com/?p=935#comment-3724</guid>
		<description>[...] of whether or not the patent system should extend to cover &quot;business methods.&quot; As Larry Downes explained at the time, the specific dispute was over the patentability of &quot;a paper-and-pencil system for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of whether or not the patent system should extend to cover &quot;business methods.&quot; As Larry Downes explained at the time, the specific dispute was over the patentability of &quot;a paper-and-pencil system for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Abandons its Principles…Not! (Necessarily) &#124; Larry Downes</title>
		<link>http://larrydownes.com/the-bilski-case-not-with-my-digital-economy-you-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Abandons its Principles…Not! (Necessarily) &#124; Larry Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrydownes.com/?p=935#comment-640</guid>
		<description>[...] broad applications that the Patent Office has been routinely granting in the last decade. (See my earlier post on the Bilski case.) If sued by a competitor, dormant patents can be useful bargaining chips in cross-licensing, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] broad applications that the Patent Office has been routinely granting in the last decade. (See my earlier post on the Bilski case.) If sued by a competitor, dormant patents can be useful bargaining chips in cross-licensing, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

